By By SAM HANANEL
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court seems split along ideological lines as it considers whether websites that collect and sell personal data can be sued for posting false information if the errors don't cause any specific harm.
The justices heard arguments Monday in a case involving Thomas Robins, a Virginia resident who noticed that an online profile about him compiled by Internet search site Spokeo.com was filled with major mistakes.
Robins, who was in his 20s, unemployed and single, found himself described as wealthy, in his 50s, holding a good job, and married with children.
The justices debated whether Robins can sue Spokeo for a technical violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, even though he could not show the mistakes marred his credit, cost him a job, or even a chance at a date.
Liberal justices seemed to side with Robins' view that being falsely portrayed is enough to show harm. But conservatives insisted the law required Robins to show exactly how he was injured.
The case is being closely watched by Facebook, Twitter and a host of other technology firms concerned about class-action lawsuits that would open them up to billions of dollars of damages for trivial violations of the fair credit law and similar statutes protecting consumer privacy rights. On the other side, consumer protection advocates say such lawsuits are the only way to hold companies accountable for mistakes.
"Seems like a concrete injury to me," Justice Elena Kagan said of the mistakes. "If somebody did it to me, I'd feel harmed."
Kagan said that Congress passed the fair credit law in the first place because lawmakers were concerned about people being injured by the dissemination of false information.
"People get these reports and you don't know what they are doing with these reports," she said.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested the false information could have harmed Robins in unexpected ways.
"I will tell you that I know plenty of single people who look at whether someone who's proposed to date is married or not," she said. "So if you're not married and there's a report out there saying you are, that's a potential injury."
Spokeo lawyer Andrew Pincus argued that Robins' claims are too speculative and not the kind of "tangible" injury to economic or property rights that Congress intended when it passed the fair credit law.
The law was designed to keep companies from compiling inaccurate information that could jeopardize a person's ability to get loans or find work. Violators can face damages of $1,000 per violation, but that can climb into the millions in class-action cases.
Justice Antonin Scalia said Congress was not focused on faulty information itself, but on the failure of credit reporting agencies to follow proper procedures in collecting and reporting data.
"In fact, Congress has not identified misinformation as a sueable harm," Scalia said.
A lower court ruled that Robins could not sue because the errors were harmless. But a federal appeals court overturned that decision, saying it was enough that Spokeo violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Arguing for Robins, attorney William Consovoy said Congress meant to allow lawsuits for people with a "personal stake" in the publication of inaccurate information.
Chief Justice John Roberts wondered what would happen if a person had an unlisted number and a data company published a phone number that happened to be wrong. Is there still an injury?
Consovoy agreed that would be enough.
But Roberts said the court has historically required an "injury in fact" that seems to be lacking in Robins' case.
Spokeo's website allows subscribers to look up personal information about almost anyone. It has a searchable database of profiles that includes addresses, phone numbers, marital status, age, employment information, education and economic health. But the information is collected from a variety of public sources and the company warns that it sometimes contains inaccuracies.
A decision is expected by the end of June.
2015-11-03 09:08:18 GMT
How does the court define domestic abuse? Whenever the child is exposed to bodily injury, sexual assault, rape, phony imprisonment or threats of injury the state can term it as domestic violence. In accordance to the domestic violence law, a household member can be ex-spouse, the sexual partner of the victim, parent of the victim, relative either through marriage or blood and parent of the victim. Domestic abuse can affect custody dispute in a large way. Domestic violence reports five years back are reviewed by the judges in the case of child custody. Any isolated case does not influence the decision of the judge. In case the danger still exists, then the judge may evaluate the situation, and restrictions of the offending party can be imposed. This is how the law takes its course.
There are dime a dozen divorce lawyers and hence finding one is no uphill task. But identifying the right divorce lawyer needs analysis. Family law is a complicated subject and can be an emotional drain on both parties. Therefore, it is easy to make mistakes under stress. In order to avoid costly mistakes, it is advised to take the suggestion of a good family lawyer. There are certain mistakes to avoid while consulting a family lawyer. Hire a lawyer in time. Many couples think that legal assistance is not required for divorce. What they fail to realize is that it takes nearly a year to complete the divorce process. There are some cases where the families live amicably after divorce.
Divorce is sometimes accompanied by child custody, visitation, child alimony, property partition, etc. All this cannot be handled with professional help. Only a professional family lawyer can provide the assistance when you decide to go for a divorce. If you do not have friends or associates who can provide you with reference, then you can Google to find the best divorce attorneys. Going through search engine can give you access to websites, forums, statistics and more. Do not go by just legal degrees. A family lawyer graduated from a reputed institution may not always be the right choice. There may be instances where a property lawyer may be migrating into family law and doesn’t have relevant experience in the latter. Therefore, it becomes essential to question them on the subject.