Texas Car Accident Lawyers - San Antonio Auto Accident Attorneys

Will you get the best settlement for your Texas car accident case?

The Texas car accident lawyer that you choose to represent you in your auto accident case is the often the difference between getting a fair settlement or no settlement. We are the smart choice for your case. Here's why.

What We Do For You After Your Texas Car Accident

You probably feel a little confused about your rights after a Texas car accident. You are not alone. The laws are complex and change on a daily basis. Our Texas car accident lawyers will explain your legal rights to you, and help you submit your claims so you can:
* Get the best possible settlement for your car accident case
* Get your medical bills and expenses paid after your car accident
* Get your lost income and wages paid after your car accident
* Get your attendant care, household service, and other insurance benefits
* Get your property damage claim settled
* Handle your no-fault insurance claim from start to finish
* Obtain your traffic accident report
* Obtain all of your medical records
How Do You Choose Your Texas Car Accident Lawyer
You need a Texas car accident law firm that will pay detailed attention to your case. We don't claim to be the biggest car accident law firm in Texas. In fact, we don't want to be the biggest car accident law firm in Texas. Why does this matter to you?

Because many law firms sign up as many auto accident cases as possible and try to handle them on a large volume basis. If your file gets caught up in one of those offices, you'll be lucky if your case ever gets settled or if your accident attorney ever returns your phone call.
We are different! In fact, we accept only a limited number of Texas car accident cases every year.
By limiting the number of cases that we accept, we can devote our full time and energy to each car accident client. If we accept your case, you are assured that an experienced car accident lawyer will handle your case. You will personally know the attorney handling your case and will not be shuffled around the office to different staff members.
Types of Car Accident Cases We Handle
We represent Texas car accident victims injured in all types of motor vehicle accident in Texas, including:

By By SAM HANANEL

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court seems split along ideological lines as it considers whether websites that collect and sell personal data can be sued for posting false information if the errors don't cause any specific harm.

The justices heard arguments Monday in a case involving Thomas Robins, a Virginia resident who noticed that an online profile about him compiled by Internet search site Spokeo.com was filled with major mistakes.

Robins, who was in his 20s, unemployed and single, found himself described as wealthy, in his 50s, holding a good job, and married with children.

The justices debated whether Robins can sue Spokeo for a technical violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, even though he could not show the mistakes marred his credit, cost him a job, or even a chance at a date.

Liberal justices seemed to side with Robins' view that being falsely portrayed is enough to show harm. But conservatives insisted the law required Robins to show exactly how he was injured.

The case is being closely watched by Facebook, Twitter and a host of other technology firms concerned about class-action lawsuits that would open them up to billions of dollars of damages for trivial violations of the fair credit law and similar statutes protecting consumer privacy rights. On the other side, consumer protection advocates say such lawsuits are the only way to hold companies accountable for mistakes.

"Seems like a concrete injury to me," Justice Elena Kagan said of the mistakes. "If somebody did it to me, I'd feel harmed."

Kagan said that Congress passed the fair credit law in the first place because lawmakers were concerned about people being injured by the dissemination of false information.

"People get these reports and you don't know what they are doing with these reports," she said.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested the false information could have harmed Robins in unexpected ways.

"I will tell you that I know plenty of single people who look at whether someone who's proposed to date is married or not," she said. "So if you're not married and there's a report out there saying you are, that's a potential injury."

Spokeo lawyer Andrew Pincus argued that Robins' claims are too speculative and not the kind of "tangible" injury to economic or property rights that Congress intended when it passed the fair credit law.

The law was designed to keep companies from compiling inaccurate information that could jeopardize a person's ability to get loans or find work. Violators can face damages of $1,000 per violation, but that can climb into the millions in class-action cases.

Justice Antonin Scalia said Congress was not focused on faulty information itself, but on the failure of credit reporting agencies to follow proper procedures in collecting and reporting data.

"In fact, Congress has not identified misinformation as a sueable harm," Scalia said.

A lower court ruled that Robins could not sue because the errors were harmless. But a federal appeals court overturned that decision, saying it was enough that Spokeo violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Arguing for Robins, attorney William Consovoy said Congress meant to allow lawsuits for people with a "personal stake" in the publication of inaccurate information.

Chief Justice John Roberts wondered what would happen if a person had an unlisted number and a data company published a phone number that happened to be wrong. Is there still an injury?

Consovoy agreed that would be enough.

But Roberts said the court has historically required an "injury in fact" that seems to be lacking in Robins' case.

Spokeo's website allows subscribers to look up personal information about almost anyone. It has a searchable database of profiles that includes addresses, phone numbers, marital status, age, employment information, education and economic health. But the information is collected from a variety of public sources and the company warns that it sometimes contains inaccuracies.

A decision is expected by the end of June.

2015-11-03 09:08:18 GMT

Top Personal Injury Tips Straight From The Experts

Has someone caused you an injury? Are you looking at month worth of rehab or medical care because of it? If so, you have reason to sue them for your injuries, pain and suffering. Here is some great info below that might will help you build a case against the person that have hurt you.

Locating the best lawyer isn't easy. Find a lawyer who is experienced and who has won similar cases before. A good personal injury lawyer is equipped with lots of information about the best ways to approach personal injury lawsuits and prevail in court.

During your initial consultation with your personal injury lawyer, check to see how organized he is. This is important because you will want someone who is on top of their game to represent you. Small personality traits like this can make all the difference when the lawyer is making your case in court.

Lots of shady attorneys run lots of ads, and you should think twice about responding to them. Besides their terrible reputation, you can't gauge a lawyers expertise or experience on a television ad alone. Always meet a lawyer face-to-face prior to making your final decision.

If you hire a personal injury lawyer and you do not think he or she is getting the job done, fire them. You are paying for their services and should not have to deal with inadequate results. Find a personal injury lawyer who is organized, intelligent and experienced to give you the best chance. Contact this law firm

Just because your lawyer has diplomas hung on the wall doesn't mean that his references are real. Check out his qualifications, including calling past clients he offers as referrals, checking out groups he is supposedly affiliated with, and checking with his alma mater. Check that his law license is still valid, too.

Representing yourself in a personal injury claim can be difficult. One of the areas that should be addressed is the type of medical authorization that you will agree to in the settlement. Will there be a time limit on the coverage? Are you restricted to a specific provider? Make sure you know before you sign a settlement.

Do not hire a lawyer who contacts you first to help out with your lawsuit. A lawyer who contacts you first to offer their services is probably not good enough to attract clients. You should politely decline their offer and keep looking for a good lawyer who has more experience with this type of cases.

Many people regularly get back pain. You can use a warm towel or a warm water bottle to relax the area. Further strain may result in chronic or permanent damage that you may have easily avoided. It may also help to talk to an attorney.

Never hire a personal injury attorney without looking into their background. Just because they have a great demeanor over the phone and a winning commercial, this does not mean that they are qualified to handle your case. Look into all of their prior cases to see if there are any red flags.

If you have sustained a personal injury it can leave you wondering who is at fault and who is going to pay. Seeking the advice of a personal injury lawyer is a great way to see if you have a case or not. If you do, you are on your way to getting compensated for your injuries.

If you take what you have learned here and put it all to work for you, you could win your case. There is no need to struggle for the next several years to pay your bills when the person responsible gets away with it. Make them pay today so you can live a life worth living.
Find more information here

Allowing children under 15 to do paper rounds before school is "in principle contrary" to human rights law, says a European watchdog.

The European Committee on Social Rights (ECSR) says the hours UK children can work are "excessive".

Some local by-laws allow UK children as young as 13 to do "light work" like delivering newspapers or shop work.

But work considered light "ceases to be so if it is performed for an excessive duration", says the report.

UK law allows children to work up to 12 hours a week during term time, with a maximum of two hours on school days and Sundays.

It stipulates children should not work more than an hour before school and should not start work before 7am or finish after 7pm - but local by-laws can sometimes be less restrictive, the report found.

The Committee monitors how individual states apply the legally binding European Social Charter.

It is part of the Council of Europe which was set up by statesmen including Sir Winston Churchill to promote human rights in Europe and is completely separate from the European Union.

The Charter requires that during the school term, the time children may work must be limited "so as not to interfere with their attendance, receptiveness and homework", the report points out.

For example "allowing children aged 15 years, still subject to compulsory education, to deliver newspapers from 6am for up to two hours per day, five days per week before school is not in conformity with the charter", it adds.

Holiday work

The report also expresses concern about work by children during the school holidays.

Excessive working hours for children can risk "their health, moral welfare or education", it suggests.

In the UK, 15- to 16-year-olds can work a maximum of 35 hours a week in the school holidays, with a maximum of eight hours on weekdays and Saturdays and two hours on Sundays.

For 13- to 14-year olds, school holiday working times are restricted to 25 hours a week, with a maximum of five hours on weekdays and Saturdays and two hours on Sundays.

The Charter requires children in full-time education to have a two-week break from any work during the school holidays in a calendar year.

In the report, the committee asks the UK for confirmation that children have two consecutive weeks free from work during the summer holiday in the United Kingdom.

It asks the UK for more detailed information on how it monitors possible illegal employment of children and what sanctions are imposed against employers who do not comply with restrictions under the law.

The Department for Education did not directly address the ECSR's suggestion that the hours UK children are allowed to work are "excessive" but said there were "clear rules to protect school age children".

"They limit time that teenagers can spend working - especially within the school term," said a spokesman.